The re-election of 91% of Congress despite a 10% approval rating is a clear sign that democracy in America is broken. Understanding how this happens is the first step in fixing our government.
Category: Campaigns & Elections
Conventional wisdom tells us that democracy is defined by all citizens voting directly for candidates for elected office. But if we look at this process of mass elections objectively and compare it with how business leaders are hired, it becomes clear that mass elections are a frighteningly broken and are the source of all of the problems in our government.
Both the Obama and Romney campaigns have been found to be full of statements that are less than truthful. Since it follows that candidates who are less than truthful during their campaigns will also be less than truthful while in office, this presents a clear and present danger to freedom of all Americans.
Americans tend to pick a political party and stick with it election after election. How do they choose their party? Does this inevitably lead to political polarization? How does sticking with one party allow for political accountability?
There is much talk of 1% of the population controlling the U.S. government. Is this really the case? If so, what is it about our system of democracy that allows it to happen?
Money in politics is a symptom of a deeper problem–the disconnect between Americans and their government. Nearly all of the problems with our government can be traced back to this disconnect. The only way to address these problems is to address the root problem of disconnect.
Politicians use negative campaigning to achieve their own personal political goals, but the damage their negativity does to our country is deep and severe.
We pride ourselves in living in a democracy, but the vast majority of Americans didn’t bother participating in our most important election. Where were they? Can we call our government a democracy when almost nobody votes?
Why are we concerned about Super PACs? People are free to vote however they please, so shouldn’t democracy be safely in the hands of the people?
Does more democracy in the form of more voting lead to a better democracy? This has been a common assumption, but in reality the opposite is true.
What could be more natural than electing members of your community to represent you in government?
A system of Local Electors would transform a chaotic and ugly election process into a logical and professional process of internal promotions. It would be the ideal hiring process.